Alternative Methods of Animal Testing for Development of Cosmetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/8qcxdf15Keywords:
Cosmetic chemistry, Animal test, Simulation, In vitro testAbstract
The cosmetic industry relies on animal testing to ensure the safe use of a cosmetic product. The unethical practices and unsanitary conditions of the testing process have led humanity to resort to alternative methods to be considered the new norm. The treatment of animals involved in the testing procedure is seriously mistreated. These traditional and outdated practices involve exposing the animals to harmful chemicals and environments, which leads to the suffering and death of these animals. If the animals survive the suffering, their lives will end regardless. Since the testing process was known to the public, society has tried its best to discontinue the corrupt method by experimenting with other procedures that do not involve animals. Many countries have enforced laws for animal rights, providing them protection to not be subject to these conditions. The alternatives include in vitro testing, computer modelling and simulation using artificial intelligence, and testing with human volunteers. These innovative methods are more accurate, reliable, and cost-efficient and should be replacing animal testing permanently worldwide.References
[1] Schwartz Natural Cosmetics, “Tradition Meets Innovation”,2024, https://s-schwartz.com/
[2] Amity Solutions, “AI to the Hero: Ending Animal Testing for Good”, 2024, https://www.amitysolutions.com/blog/ai-endinganimal-testing-for-good
[3] Merriam-Webster, “Asphyxiation Definition & Meaning”, 2024, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ asphyxiation
[4] Blackstone Beauty Blog, “Cosmetic Product Development: From Concept to Launch”, 2019, https://www.blackstonebeauty. com/post/cosmetic-product-development
[5] Cosmetics, “Cruelty Free International”, 2024, https:// crueltyfreeinternational.org/make-change/cosmetics
[6] Cosmetics animal testing FAQ,“The Humane Society of the United States”, 2024, https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/ cosmetics-animal-testing-faq
[7] FDA, “Parabens in Cosmetics”, 2022, https://www.fda.gov/ cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredients/parabens-cosmetics
[8] ECHA, “QSAR models”, 2024, https://echa.europa.eu/ support/registration/how-to-avoid-unnecessary-testing-onanimals/qsar-models
[9] National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, “Tissue Chip for Drug Screening”, 2024, https://ncats.nih.gov/ research/research-activities/tissue-chip
[10] Aptean, “6 Essential Steps in New Cosmetics Product Development.”, 2024,www.aptean.com/blog/cosmetics-productdevelopment.
[11] Basketter, D. A., et al. Human testing of skin irritation: guidelines for the human repeated insult patch test (HRIPT). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2002, 40(12): 1879-1892.
[12] Basketter, D. A., & Kimber, I. Skin sensitization, vehicle effects, and the local lymph node assay: a review. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 2010, 29(1): 52-58.
[13] Golden, R., Gandy, J., & Vollmer, G. A review of the endocrine activity of parabens and implications for potential risks to human health. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2005, 35(5): 435-458.
[14] Hartung, T., & Daston, G. Are in vitro tests suitable for regulatory use? Toxicological Sciences, 2009, 111(2), 233-237.
[15] Patlewicz, G., & Fitzpatrick, J. M. Current and future perspectives on the development, evaluation, and application of Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-409X in silico approaches for predicting toxicity. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2016, 29(4): 438-451.
[16] van der Valk, P. G., & Maibach, H. I. A decade of clinical experience with a predictive human skin test. Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 62(2): 107-114.
[17] Viceconti, M., Henney, A., & Morley-Fletcher, E. In silico clinical trials: how computer simulation will transform the biomedical industry. International Journal of Clinical Trials, 2016, 3(2): 37-46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
