The Role of Digital Navigation Systems in Improving Implant Surgery Outcomes

Authors

  • Shengyu Ge
  • Hongjing Rong
  • Yulu Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/xdemhx06

Keywords:

Dental Navigation Systems, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Surgical Guides, Aug-mented Reality, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Dental navigation systems have become indispensable tools in modern implantology, dramatically improving the accuracy of implant placements. These systems, which rely heavily on advanced imaging technologies like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), enable clinicians to precisely plan and execute implant procedures. The workflow involves several key components, including pre-operative planning, the use of surgical guides, and dynamic real-time feedback during surgery. Studies demonstrate that navigation systems significantly reduce the margin of error, offering up to 0.6 mm precision in critical areas. Additionally, digital technologies such as 3D imaging and computer-assisted design have further enhanced the predictability and success of dental implant surgeries. While these systems offer numerous advantages, including improved patient outcomes and reduced postoperative morbidity, they also present challenges. High costs, steep learning curves, and potential calibration errors are notable drawbacks that limit widespread adoption. Nonetheless, the ongoing integration of augmented reality, robotics, and artificial intelligence in dental navigation holds great promise for further advancements in the field. Moreover, the registration and regulatory compliance of these systems are critical in ensuring their accuracy and safety, underscoring the need for comprehensive studies to validate their use in clinical practice.

References

[1] Ahmad, P., Alam, M., Aldajani, A., Alahmari, A., Alanazi, A., Stoddart, M., & Sghaireen, M. Dental robotics: a disruptive technology. Sensors, 2021, 21(10), 3308.

[2] Emery, R., Merritt, S., Lank, K., & Gibbs, J.. Accuracy of dynamic navigation for dental implant placement–model-based evaluation. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2016, 42(5), 399-405.

[3] Gao, Y., Qin, C., Tao, B., Hu, J., Wu, Y., & Chen, X. An electromagnetic tracking implantation navigation system in dentistry with virtual calibration. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2021, 17(2).

[4] Karami, D., Alborzinia, H., Amid, R., Kadkhodazadeh, M., Yousefi, N., & Badakhshan, S. In-office guided implant placement for prosthetically driven implant surgery. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 2017, 10(3), 246-254.

[5] Ma, L., Jiang, W., Zhang, B., Qu, X., Ning, G., Zhang, X., & Liao, H. Augmented reality surgical navigation with accurate Dean&Francis Shengyu Ge, Hongjing Rong, and Yulu Wang cbct-patient registration for dental implant placement. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2018, 57(1), 47-57.

[6] Nagata, K. Verification of the accuracy of dynamic navigation for conventional and mouthpiece methods: in vivo study. BMC Oral Health, 2024, 24(1).

[7] Oillic, A. Navigation in oral surgery: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, 2023, 29(4), 44.

[8] Panchal, N., Mahmood, L., Retana, A., & Emery, R. Dynamic navigation for dental implant surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 2019, 31(4), 539-547.

[9] Pei, X., Liu, X., Iao, S., Ma, F., Li, H., & Sun, F. Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2024, 131(4), 668–674.

[10] Stefanelli, L., DeGroot, B., Lipton, D., & Mandelaris, G. Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2019, 34(1), 205-213. https://doi. org/10.11607/jomi.6966

[11] Sun, T., Lan, T., Pan, C., & Lee, H. Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2017, 34(1), 56-64.

[12] Sun, T., Lee, H., & Lan, T. The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system. BMC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1).

[13] Sun, T., Lee, H., & Lan, T. Comparing accuracy of implant installation with a navigation system (ns), a laboratory guide (lg), ns with lg, and freehand drilling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(6), 2107.

[14] Wang, X., Liu, L., Guan, M., Liu, Q., Zhao, T., & Li, H. The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: an in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry, 2022, 124, 104240.

[15] Wang, X., Shaheen, E., Shujaat, S., Meeus, J., Legrand, P., Lahoud, P., Jacobs, R. Influence of experience on dental implant placement: an in vitro comparison of freehand, static guided and dynamic navigation approaches. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 2022, 8(1).

[16] Yan, B., Zhang, W., Cai, L., Li, Z., Bao, K., Rao, Y., Yang, R. An optics-guided robotic system for dental implant surgery.2021.

[17] zhang, k. Comparative accuracy assessment of dental surgical robotics and dynamic navigation in immediate implant prosthesis restoration. 2023.

[18] Haron, N., Zain, R. B., Ramanathan, A., et al.. m-Health for Early Detection of Oral Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2023, 26(3), 278–285.

[19] Xiao-yu W., Lin L., Miao-sheng G., Qian L., Tong Z., & Hong-bo L.The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study, Journal of Dentistry, 2022.

[20] Rezaie, F., Farshbaf, M., Dahri, M., Masjedi, M., Maleki, R., Amini, F., Wirth, J., Moharamzadeh, K., Weber, F. E., & Tayebi, L. 3D Printing of Dental Prostheses: Current and Emerging Applications. Journal of composites science, 2023, 7(2), 80.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-26