3D Bio printed Biomimetic Bone Scaffolds for Osteoporotic Fracture Repair
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/t1xcs465Keywords:
3D bioprinting, osteoporotic fracture repair, biomimetic bone scaffoldAbstract
With the aging of the population and the increase of traumatic events, traditional bone repair materials are facing problems such as insufficient donors, immune rejection and mechanical mismatch, and are particularly difficult to meet the repair needs of osteoporotic fractures. 3D bioprinting technology provides an innovative solution for bone tissue engineering through the bionic strategy of "component-structure-function". This article focuses on the scenario of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, systematically exploring the material design logic, functional verification system and clinical transformation path of 3D bioprinted bionic bone scaffolds, aiming to break through the traditional technical bottlenecks and promote precise bone regeneration. Existing studies have shown that the boron ions released from the degradation of BBG stents can activate osteogenic signals. The survival rate of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells is as high as 95%, the in vitro ALP activity is increased by 3.8 times, and the vascularized bone volume in vivo is doubled compared with the single-cell group. The multi-nozzle parallel printing technology will significantly increase production capacity, and the supercritical CO₂ sterilization technology retains more than 90% of the growth factor activity. Despite the current challenges such as material homogenization and high individualized costs, in the future, by integrating gene editing, dynamic metabolic regulation materials, and AI optimization, it is expected to drive the transformation of bone tissue engineering from a "static replacement" paradigm to a "dynamic regeneration" one, laying the foundation for large-scale clinical application.
References
[1] Joshua R, Andrew F, Mohit A, et al. Acute spinal problems in the elderly. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2025, 86(4): 1–16.
[2] Wang Z, Sun Y, Li C. Advances in 3D printing technology for preparing bone tissue engineering scaffolds from biodegradable materials. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2024: 121483547–1483547.
[3] Asakura T, Diep T T T, Ueda Y, et al. Analysis of the effect of human type I collagen-derived peptide on bone regenerative capacity and comparison with various collagen materials in vivo. Medicina, 2025, 61(1): 57.
[4] Stan E, Muresan O C, Daescu E, et al. A review of histological techniques for differentiating human bone from animal bone. Methods and Protocols, 2024, 7(4): 51.
[5] C S C, Luis C. Fabric dependence of wave propagation in anisotropic porous media. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2011, 10(1): 39–65.
[6] Cui Xin, Li Xuejin, Hu Yahui, et al. Study on mass transfer of different molecules in bone lacuna–canalicular system under gravitational field. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, 2025: 1–8 [2025-05-15]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1374. n.20250123.1358.002.html.
[7] Lee J, Kwon J, Suk S K, et al. Bone resorption phenomenon following anterior-posterior combined cervical fusion surgery: Is it a pathologic finding?. European Spine Journal, 2025: 1–7.
[8] Castiblanco T M, Moreno Marín J P, Osorio M. Natural macromolecule-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting: A systematic review of composition, physicochemical characterization, and biomedical applications. Bioprinting, 2025, 48: e00407.
[9] Gharivi M, et al. Fabrication and characterization of functionalized carbon nanotube-reinforced hydroxyapatite/ silk fibroin scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2025, 338: 130656.
[10] Li W, et al. Near infrared responsive gold nanorods attenuate osteoarthritis progression by targeting TRPV1. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2024, 32(S1): S299.
[11] Yang S, et al. A five-in-one novel MOF-modified injectable hydrogel with thermo-sensitive and adhesive properties for promoting alveolar bone repair in periodontitis. Bioactive Materials, 2024, 41: 239–256.
[12] Tan Renyu. Comparative study on degradation performance and osteogenic ability of silicon-based and boron-based bioactive glasses. Guangxi: Guangxi Medical University, 2021.
[13] Xiaojie X, Jinbing C, Yiling C, et al. A photo-thermal dual crosslinked chitosan-based hydrogel membrane for guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2025: 296139712.
[14] Hao S, Zhou D, Wang F, et al. Hamburger-like biomimetic nutrient periosteum with osteoimmunomodulation and angio-/ osteo-genesis capacity promoted critical-size bone defect repair. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024: 489150990.
[15] Khobragade S S, Deshmukh M, Vyas U, et al. Innovative approaches in bone tissue engineering: Strategies for cancer treatment and recovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2025, 26(9): 3937.
[16] Giulia B, Nikolaos D, Stefano S, et al. Editorial: Advances in additive manufacturing technologies for the production of tissue-engineered bone scaffolds for dental applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2022: 10980430.
[17] Chen G, Yuxuan L, Xiaoyun L, et al. 3D bioprinted conductive spinal cord biomimetic scaffolds for promoting neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells and repairing of spinal cord injury. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 451(P3).
[18] Eleonora Z, Miriam M, Federico M, et al. Tailoring the microarchitectures of 3D printed bone-like scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Bioengineering (Basel), 2023, 10(5).
[19] Stafin K, Śliwa P, Piątkowski M. Towards polycaprolactonebased scaffolds for alveolar bone tissue engineering: A biomimetic approach in a 3D printing technique. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(22).
[20] Menozzi C G, Depaoli A, Ramella M, et al. Hightemperature polylactic acid proves reliable and safe for manufacturing 3D-printed patient-specific instruments in pediatric orthopedics—Results from over 80 personalized devices employed in 47 surgeries. Polymers, 2024, 16(9).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
