Applications and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in gRNA Design

Authors

  • Xiubin Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/rj6d1c41

Keywords:

CRISPR, AI model, guideRNA design

Abstract

The rapid development of CRISPR gene editing has brought revolutionary breakthroughs to the biomedical area, yet the design of gRNA is still facing problems as unstable editing efficiency and the risk of off-target. The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has guided this issue to a brighter future. Studies have shown that deep learning models can predict editing efficiency and assess off-target risk precisely through analyzing information as the sequence features of gRNA, while the introduction of tools like Reinforcement Learning (RL) further enlarges the space of gRNA design. There is still a deficiency in recent studies. This paper analyzes the application of AI in gRNA design, including editing efficiency and off-target risk assessment. The workflow, performance, and limitations of each model are concluded, and the conclusion of AI having a great devotion to gRNA design and the tips for choosing different models in different cases are given. This research provides references about choosing and designing models, but there are still unsolved challenges in aspects of building standard datasets and public databases. In the future, gRNA design can be optimized by reinforcing the use of Federated Learning (FL) and single-cell CRISPR screening technology.

References

[1] Doench J G, et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation. Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32: 1262-1267.

[2] Fu Y F, et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31: 822-826.

[3] Doench J G, et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nature Biotechnology, 2016, 34: 184-191.

[4] Chuai G H, et al. DeepCRISPR: optimized CRISPR guide RNA design by deep learning. Genome Biology, 2018, 19: 80.

[5] Kim H K, et al. SpCas9 activity prediction by DeepSpCas9, a deep learning–based model with high generalization performance. Science Advances, 2019, 5: eaax9249.

[6] Qu Y H, et al. CRISPR-GPT for agentic automation of geneediting experiments. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2025.

[7] Hsu P D, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31: 827-832.

[8] Ranzoni A M, et al. Integrative Single-Cell RNA-Seq and ATAC-Seq Analysis of Human Developmental Hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell, 2021, 28: 472-487.

[9] Kim H K, et al. Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR-Cpf1 guide RNA activity. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36: 239-241.

[10] Mathis N, et al. Predicting prime editing efficiency and product purity by deep learning. Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41: 1151-1159.

[11] Labun K, et al. CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Research, 2016, 44: W272-W276.

[12] Bae S, Park J, Kim J S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30: 1473- 1475.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23