Advances in Protein Structure Prediction through Deep Learning Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/rsjk7x31Keywords:
Protein Structure Prediction, Deep Learn-ing, AlphaFold, Neural Network Architectures, CASPAbstract
Accurate protein structure prediction (PSP) is essential for understanding biological function. However, experimental determination of protein structures remains costly and limited in scope. In recent years, advances in deep learning (DL) have substantially improved PSP. These methods help close the gap between the vast number of known protein sequences and limited experimentally resolved structures. This article reviews five representative DL architectures: convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), transformers, graph neural networks (GNNs), and diffusion-based models. Key protein databases used for training and validation are also introduced, including the Protein Data Bank (PDB), UniProt, Pfam, RefSeq, and the Big Fantastic Database (BFD). Performance evaluations based on the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) benchmarks show that models such as AlphaFold2 and its successors achieve near-experimental accuracy. Nevertheless, challenges remain for low-homology sequences, protein–protein interactions, and dynamic folding pathways. Current limitations of DL in PSP also include data bias, restricted interpretability, and an inability to fully capture protein dynamics. To overcome these barriers, future directions may include explainable AI, debiased datasets, and integration with molecular dynamics simulations.
References
[1] Y. Meng, Z. Zhang, C. Zhou, et al, Protein structure prediction via deep learning: an in-depth review. Front. Pharmacol. 16, 1498662 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1498662
[2] Z. Zhang, C. Ou, Y. Cho, et al, Artificial intelligence methods for protein folding and design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 93, 103066 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103066
[3] The UniProt Consortium, A. Bateman, M-J. Martin, et al, UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D609–D617 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/ gkae1010
[4] RCSB Protein Data Bank (RPD Bank), PDB Statistics: Overall Growth of Released Structures Per Year. https://www. rcsb.org/stats/growth/growth-released-structures (accessed 30 Jul 2025).
[5] K.A. Dill, S.B. Ozkan, T.R. Weikl, et al, The protein folding problem: when will it be solved? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 342–346 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2007.06.001
[6] C.B. Anfinsen, Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science. 181, 223–230 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.181.4096.223
[7] J. Abramson, J. Adler, J. Dunger, et al, Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 630, 493–500 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- 024-07487-w
[8] L. Kong, F. Ju, W-M. Zheng, et al, ProALIGN: Directly learning alignments for protein structure prediction via exploiting context-specific alignment motifs (2020). Dean&Francis Xinyang Zhang
[9] J. Xu, M. McPartlon, J. Li, Improved protein structure prediction by deep learning irrespective of co-evolution information. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 601–609 (2021). https://doi. org/10.1038/s42256-021-00348-5
[10] Z. Miao, Q. Wang, X. Xiao, et al, CSI-LSTM: a web server to predict protein secondary structure using bidirectional long short term memory and NMR chemical shifts. J. Biomol. NMR. 75, 393–400 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-021-00383-9
[11] J. Antony, A. Penikalapati, J.V.K. Reddy, et al, Towards protein tertiary structure prediction using LSTM/BLSTM, in Advances in Computing and Network Communications, eds. S.M. Thampi, E. Gelenbe, M. Atiquzzaman, et al, Springer, Singapore, pp. 65–77 (2021).
[12] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, et al, Attention is all you need (2017).
[13] J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, et al, Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 596, 583–589
[2021] https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
[14] Z. Lin, H. Akin, R. Rao, et al, Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science. 379, 1123–1130 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade2574
[15] R. Wu, F. Ding, R. Wang, et al, High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence (2022).
[16] T.H. Nahid, F.A. Jui, P.C. Shill, Protein secondary structure prediction using graph neural network, in Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT), IEEE, Khulna, Bangladesh, October 2021, pp. 1–6 (2021)
[17] G. He, J. Liu, D. Liu, G. Zhang, GraphGPSM: a global scoring model for protein structure using graph neural networks. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad219 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/ bib/bbad219
[18] M. Baek, F. DiMaio, I. Anishchenko, et al, Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a threetrack neural network. Science. 373, 871–876 (2021) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.abj8754
[19] J.L. Watson, D. Juergens, N.R. Bennett, et al, De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature. 620, 1089–1100 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8
[20] B. Jing, E. Erives, P. Pao-Huang, et al, EigenFold: Generative protein structure prediction with diffusion models (2023)
[21] J. Mistry, S. Chuguransky, L. Williams, et al, Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412– D419 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa913
[22] T. Goldfarb, V.K. Kodali, S. Pujar, et al, NCBI RefSeq: reference sequence standards through 25 years of curation and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D243–D257 (2025) https:// doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1038
[23] A. Kryshtafovych, T. Schwede, M. Topf, et al, Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XV. Proteins. 91, 1539–1549 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26617
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
