AI-Driven Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control System Optimization And Bias Alarming Analysis

Authors

  • Zihan Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/5qr3k155

Keywords:

PBRTQC, Machine Learning, quality con-trol, Westgard Rules

Abstract

Patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) is widely used in clinical laboratories, providing a sophisticated approach to monitoring the analytical performance of laboratory instruments using the results generated from actual patient samples. Compared with the traditional quality control (QC), which easily triggers false alarms, delayed error detection, and limited specificity and sensitivity, PBRTQC overcomes critical gaps by proficiently adopting machine learning. Implemented under a set of standardized rules and methods, PBRTQC enables intelligent error detection, handling of complex scenarios, and competitive operational efficiency gains. However, PBRTQC is still facing some challenges due to an imbalance of data resources and a limited ability to identify real-world issues when models are only trained on simulated datasets. This article discusses the development of PBRTQC from the initial Westgard rule to several typical AI-driven machine learning models, including comparing their mechanisms and the disparity in accuracy performance. The compelling advantages of the machine learning models will be highlighted, such as their highly precise model structure and algorithm. At the same time, current limitations of ML models and critical thinking for future projection are also discussed.

References

[1] Westgard, J. O. (2016). Basic QC Practices: Training in Statistical Quality Control for Medical Laboratories (4th ed.). Madison, WI: Westgard QC. ISBN 978-1-886958-30-2.

[2] Fernando, J. (n.d.). Moving average (MA): Purpose, uses, formula, and examples. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia. com/terms/m/movingaverage.asp

[3] Lorde, N., Mahapatra, S., & Kalaria, T. (2024). Machine Learning for Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control (PBRTQC), Analytical and Preanalytical Error Detection in Clinical Laboratory. Diagnostics, 14(16), 1808. https://doi. org/10.3390/diagnostics14161808

[4] Mastering AUC-Roc: Essential Model Evaluation Techniques. Galileo. (n.d.). https://galileo.ai/blog/auc-rocmodel-evalulation

[5] Author links open overlay panelRand R. Wilcox. (n.d.). Summarizing data. Applying Contemporary Statistical Techniques. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/ pii/B9780127515410500249

[6] Duan X, Zhang M, Liu Y, Zheng W, Lim CY, Kim S, Loh TP, Guo W, Zhou R, Badrick T; Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control Working Group of the Asia Pacific Federation of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Next-Generation Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control Models. Ann Lab Med. 2024 Sep 1;44(5):385-391. doi: 10.3343/alm 2024.0053. Epub 2024 Jun 5. PMID: 38835211; PMCID: PMC11169771.

[7] Senyu Senyu Medicine result Ai-PBRTQC - Wisdom test. (2025, February 16). https://www.sxmedical.net/ gongsixinw/106.html

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19