Vaccine Innovation, Ethics, and Global Equity: Lessons from COVID-19 for Future Public Health Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/nhfdw978Keywords:
Vaccine Equity, Bioethics, Global Health GovernanceAbstract
Vaccines constitute a vital bulwark of global public health. From eradicating smallpox to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, technological advances have profoundly reshaped immunisation strategies. Over the past two decades, novel platforms such as mRNA and adenovirus vectors have dramatically shortened development cycles. Accelerated approval processes have not only fuelled ethical debates but also revealed deeper tensions in how societies balance urgency with accountability. Questions surrounding long-term safety, the adequacy of informed consent, and the transparency of regulatory decisions have persisted, often resurfacing in public discussions and scholarly critiques. These issues became especially prominent during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period that laid bare severe inequities in global vaccine distribution and made visible the uneven capacity of health systems to respond to crisis. High-income nations were able to secure, stockpile, and administer doses rapidly, while many lowincome countries endured chronic shortages and delayed coverage, resulting in disproportionately high mortality rates and heightened risks of viral mutations that ultimately threatened the health security of all populations.
References
[1] Shah, J., Karimzadeh, S., Al-Ahdal, T. M. A., et al. Ethical issues in COVID-19 vaccine research and development. Frontiers in Public Health, 2020, 8: 585048. https://pmc.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7675299/
[2] El-Elimat, T., et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: A review of global perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health, 2024, 12: 1429265. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/ articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1429265/full
[3] Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S., Palayew, A., et al. Global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature Medicine, 2021, 27: 225–228. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ PMC10254992/
[4] Ye, Y., Zhang, Q., Wei, X., et al. Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines makes a life-saving difference to all countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6: 207–216. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01289-8
[5] Jeyanathan, M., Afkhami, S., Smaill, F., et al. Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2021, 21(10): 613–632. https://pmc.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013982/
[6] Bollyky, T. J., et al. Vaccine nationalism and the dynamics of global vaccine supply. The Lancet, 2023, 402(10397): 1255– 1264. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10254992/
[7] Park, A. Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine patent dispute. TIME, 2022. https://time.com/6155934/moderna-covid-19- vaccine-patent/
[8] Baden, L. R., El Sahly, H. M., Essink, B., et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 2021, 384(5): 403–416. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
[9] Caplan, A. Ethical challenges of COVID-19 vaccination. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2021, 47(9): 571–574. https://doi. org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107397
[10] De Alwis, R., Chen, S., Gan, E. S., Ooi, E. E. A new generation of vaccines against COVID-19. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2021, 20(7): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573- 021-00072-8
[11] Greinacher, A., Thiele, T., Warkentin, T. E., et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. New England Journal of Medicine, 2021, 384: 2092–2101. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840 Dean&Francis Yuchen Shi
[12] Krammer, F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature, 2020, 586: 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- 020-2798-3
[13] Larson, H. J., Broniatowski, D. A., & Jarrett, C. Vaccine confidence in the time of COVID-19. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2022, 22: 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41577-022-00773-w
[14] Lurie, N., Saville, M., Hatchett, R., & Halton, J. Developing COVID-19 vaccines at pandemic speed. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, 382: 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMp2005630
[15] Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W., & Weissman, D. mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2018, 17(4): 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrd.2017.243
[16] Polack, F. P., Thomas, S. J., Kitchin, N., et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, 383: 2603–2615. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
[17] Shimabukuro, T., et al. Myocarditis cases reported after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. JAMA, 2021, 326(20): 2090–2092. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.24110
[18] Voysey, M., Clemens, S. A., Madhi, S. A., et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222). The Lancet, 2021, 397(10269): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)32661-1
[19] Gozzi, N., Chinazzi, M., Dean, N. E., et al. Estimating the impact of COVID-19 vaccine inequities: A modeling study. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 3272. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-023-39098-w
[20] Gozzi N, Chinazzi M, Dean NE, et al. Estimating the impact of COVID-19 vaccine inequities: a modeling study. Nature Communications, 2023, 14:3272. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-39098-w
[21] Wikipedia. International inequality. 2022. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_inequality
[22] KFF. Tracking global COVID-19 vaccine equity: An update. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2022. Available at: https:// www.kff.org/covid-19/tracking-global-covid-19-vaccine-equityan-update/
[23] Subbaraman N. Global perspectives on COVID-19 inequity. PubMed Central, 2023. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/articles/PMC10098302/
[24] Wikipedia. COVAX. 2023. Available at: https:// zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVAX
[25] Gavi. Preliminary assessment: COVAX’s impact in lowerincome countries. Gavi, 2022. Available at: https://www. gavi.org/news-resources/knowledge-products/preliminaryassessment-covaxs-impact-lower-income-countries
[26] de Bengy Puyvallée A, Storeng KT. COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity. Global Health, 2022, 18:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022- 00801-z
[27] Usher AD. A beautiful idea: How COVAX fell short. The Lancet, 2021, 397(10292):2322–2325. https://www.thelancet. com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2821%2901367-2/ fulltext
[28] Subbaraman N. Vaccine inequities and global gaps. PubMed Central, 2023. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ articles/PMC10098302/
[29] World Health Organization. COVAX calls for urgent action to close vaccine equity gap. WHO News Release, May 20, 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/20-05-2022-covaxcalls-for-urgent-action-to-close-vaccine-equity-gap
[30] Taylor A. COVAX delivery and global health equity. Public Health Challenges, 2023, 1(2):185. Wiley Online Library. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ puh2.185
[31] Wikipedia. TRIPS Agreement waiver. 2023. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIPS_Agreement_waiver
[32] Wilkinson E. Vaccine equity and ethical challenges: A public health perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 2023, 11:1087662. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1087662/full
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
