Control Mechanisms and Strategies of Upper-Limb Exoskeleton Rehabilitation Robots
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/7jpath38Keywords:
Electromyography (EMG), Lower-limb exoskeleton, Rehabilitation robots, Electroencepha-lography (EEG)Abstract
Diseases such as stroke are a leading cause of long-term chronic disability around the world and affect people in their most productive years, frequently posing disabling motor impairments that limit dependency and a person’s quality of life. Traditional rehabilitation processes have made significant advances, yet continue to be limited due to physical intensity, consistency and scalability. Exoskeleton rehabilitation robots have emerged as a possible solution to address these issues by providing repetitive, controlled, and adaptive treatment. This dissertation reviewed some of the recent advances made in the control mechanisms to develop upper-limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robots. The focus was on passive and active control methods. Passive control methods provide safety and mechanical consistency, particularly beneficial to patients in the early phase of recovery, while active control methods, such as those using electromyography (EMG) and electroencephalography (EEG), allow patient participation in the rehabilitation process by decoding the patient’s motor intent. Those findings demonstrated that neither passive nor active approaches are mutually exclusive, but rather exist on a spectrum of control methods, and a combination of both may offer the best opportunities for rehabilitation care.
References
[1] World Health Organization. Stroke, cerebrovascular accident. World Health Organization – Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, 2025. Available at: https://www.emro.who.int/ health-topics/stroke-cerebrovascular-accident/index.html
[2] Louie D R, Eng J J. Powered robotic exoskeletons in poststroke rehabilitation of gait: A scoping review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2016, 13(1).
[3] Seung S, Liu P, Park S, Park J O, Ko S Y. Single-port robotic manipulator system for brain tumor removal surgery: SiromanS. Mechatronics, 2015, 26: 16–28.
[4] Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer D J. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2009, 6(1).
[5] Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2014, 11(1): 3.
[6] Krebs H I, Ferraro M, Buerger S P, Newbery M J, Makiyama A, Sandmann M, Lynch D, Volpe B T, Hogan N. Rehabilitation robotics: Pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-MANUS. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2004, 1(1): 5.
[7] Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, Läer L, Yilmaz Ö, Brasil F L, Birbaumer N. Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study. Annals of Neurology, 2013, 74(1): 100–108.
[8] Knill A S, Studer B, Wolf P, Riener R, Goffredo M, Maggioni Dean&Francis Shixiang Feng, Zhichen Li and Luosheng Zhou S. Kinematic assessment of upper limb movements using the ArmeoPower robotic exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2024, 32: 3942–3952.
[9] Editorial Office of Computer Applications Research. Multistream convolutional EMG gesture recognition network with attention mechanism. Computer Applications Research, 2025. Available at: https://www.arocmag.cn/abs/2021.04.0100
[10] Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Research progress on EMG pattern recognition in intelligent interaction, 2021. Available at: http://neural.siat.ac.cn/index.php/ news/109.shtml
[11] Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G. Neurofeedback training for BCI control. The Frontiers Collection, 2009: 65–78.
[12] Krebs H I, Celestino J, Williams D, Ferraro M, Hogan N. A wrist extension module for MIT-MANUS. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 2006, 306: 377–390.
[13] Ang K K, Guan C, Phua K S, Wang C, Zhou L, Tang K Y, Chua K S G. Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: Results of a threearmed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 2014, 7: 30.
[14] Zhang X, Qu Y, Zhang G, Wang Z, Chen C, Xu X. Review of sEMG for exoskeleton robots: Motion intention recognition techniques and applications. Sensors, 2025, 25(8): 2448.
[15] Kong K, Bae J, Tomizuka M. Mechatronic considerations for actuation of human assistive wearable robotics: Robust control of a series elastic actuator. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 2015: 401–429.
[16] Paine N, Oh S, Sentis L. Design and control considerations for high-performance series elastic actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 19(3): 1080–1091.
[17] Pratt G A, Williamson M M. Series elastic actuators. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, 1995, 1: 399–406.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
