The Impact of Human Hunting Behaviour on the Evolution and Ecology of Land Mammals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/11t6tx69Keywords:
Animal domestication, human hunting behavior, artificial selection, ecological impact, evolutionary trajectoryAbstract
This paper demonstrates how human hunting has driven animal domestication and influenced the evolutionary trajectory of terrestrial ecosystems and organisms. It compares direct, selective hunting-a “super predator” signal that leads to rapid population decline and trait transformation - with indirect pressures spread through domesticated communities and wild partners, including vegetation and soil changes, greenhouse gas emissions, and pathogen transmission. The results of this paper emphasize the behavioral choices (compliance, sociality, constraint tolerance) and the welfare externalities and ecological costs of management dependence in the domestication process. The evidence also suggests that the benefits depend on the environment (such as biodiversity compatible with moderate grazing and agroforestry design). Welfare outcomes within the framework of the Anthropocene constitute a part of the human environmental footprint. The results proposed a practical comprehensive approach, which replaces single-indicator optimization with multiobjective design, while optimizing biodiversity, climate, productivity and welfare, and incorporating health monitoring into the human-machine interface of wildlife and livestock to prevent disease transmission. At the same time, it avoids selective hunting and reports animal-based indicators (such as temperament, lameness, avoidance distance) and ecosystem indicators to guide responsible management.
References
tices. Secondly, controlling the wildness of companion [1] Larson, G., & Fuller, D. Q. (2014). The evolution of animal animals. Policies should include mandatory registration, domestication. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and sterilization, and confinement of cats and dogs in urban Systematics, 45(1), 115–136.
and wildlife areas. In ecologically sensitive areas such as [2] Larson, G., et.al. (2005). Worldwide phylogeography of wild islands, reefs, and nature reserves, the government can boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication. Science, implement targeted plans to remove stray companion an- 307(5715), 1618–1621.
imals and restore affected ecosystems. Finally, promoting [3] Librado, P., et.al. (2024). Widespread horse-based mobility transparency in the selection and harvesting practices. arose around 2200 bce in Eurasia. Nature, 631(8022), 819–825. Due to humans playing the role of „selective super preda- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07597-5
tors“ in both wild hunting and domestic breeding, policies [4] Fitak, R. R., et.al. (2020). Genomic signatures of should minimize directional selection pressure in these domestication in Old World camels. Communications Biology, two situations. For domestic breeding, this means requir- 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-1039-5
ing breeders to disclose the health risks of selected traits [5] Bennett, E. A., et.al. (2022). The genetic identity of the (such as informing consumers of the respiratory risks of earliest human-made hybrid animals, the kungas of Syroflat-faced dogs) [7,11]. Mesopotamia. Science Advances, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1126/ In addition, welfare and ecological considerations should sciadv.abm0218
be integrated in policy design, and animal welfare and [6] Grisart, B., et.al. (2002). Positional Candidate Cloning of a ecological protection should be regarded as equally im- QTL in Dairy Cattle: Identification of a Missense Mutation in portant constraints rather than remedial measures after- the Bovine DGAT1 Gene with Major Effect on Milk Yield and wards. For example, when formulating grazing policies, Composition. Genome Research, 12(2), 222–231. https://doi. the government should consider both the impact of graz- org/10.1101/gr.224202
ing on grassland ecosystems and the welfare of livestock [7] Thaller, G., et.al. (2003). Effects of DGAT1 variants on milk [12]. When designing wildlife conservation plans, the production traits in German cattle breeds1. Journal of Animal conflict between protection and the welfare of companion Science, 81(8), 1911–1918.
animals should be resolved (such as using trapping, steril- [8] Pan, H., et.al.(2021). Grazing weakens competitive ization release instead of killing stray cats) [13]. interactions between active methanotrophs and nitrifiers modulating greenhouse-gas emissions in grassland soils. ISME Communications, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021- 8. Conclusion 00068-2
This paper outlines humanity’s shift from hunting to an- [9] Lepczyk, C. A., et.al.(2023). A global synthesis and imal domestication, showing how human selection for assessment of free-ranging domestic cat diet. Nature production (e.g., milk yield), behavioral (e.g., docility) Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023- and physiological (e.g., starch digestion) traits drove 42766-6
rapid evolution in domesticates like cattle and dogs. No- [10] Allendorf, F. W., & Hard, J. J. (2009). Human-induced tably, domestication is bidirectional—it also reshaped evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild human societies, such as enabling settled agriculture. Yet animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, domestication brought lasting ecological impacts: large- 106(supplement_1), 9987–9994.
scale livestock grazing causes vegetation degradation [11] Chang, J., et.al.(2019). Revisiting enteric methane emissions and greenhouse gas emissions, while feral companion from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature. animals threaten biodiversity. This, plus domestic species’ Nature Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- total dependence on humans, makes domestication a key 019-11066-3
Anthropocene event, marking humanity’s shift from an [12] Wiethoelter, A. K., et.al. (2015). Global trends in infectious ecosystem component to a force shaping evolution and diseases at the wildlife–livestock interface. Proceedings of the ecology. Human activity now rivals natural selection as an National Academy of Sciences, 112(31), 9662–9667. https://doi. evolutionary driver: ensuring domestic species’ welfare org/10.1073/pnas.1422741112
and protecting wild ecosystems. The One-Health frame- [13] Dufresnes, C., et.al.(2019). Two decades of non-invasive work and policies like standardized management offer genetic monitoring of the grey wolves recolonizing the Alps solutions. Ultimately, this transition is a reminder of hu- support very limited dog introgression. Scientific Reports, 9(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
