Advances in Bioengineering: Head Bone Replacement in Humans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/f0048k73Keywords:
nanotechnology, 3D printing, st em cellsAbstract
This article presents an extensive review of the latest breakthroughs in cranial bone replacement, a major innovation in bioengineering and regenerative medicine. This paper examines conventional techniques for treating cranial bone disorders, including artificial implants and autografts, and notes their drawbacks. The article examines advanced methods, such as 3D bioprinting, bioactive scaffolds, and therapies based on stem cells, which provide a hopeful substitute for patients. It underscores the significance of interdisciplinary teamwork of biologists, material scientists, and healthcare professionals in promoting these advances. Furthermore, the article addresses ethical considerations relating to identity and consent. Furthermore, this study explores the potential impact of head bone replacement on patient outcomes, quality of life, and the healthcare system. These advancements have the potential to redefine craniofacial surgery and enhance the lives of individuals who suffer from head bone-related ailments. This marks a significant milestone in the evolution of bioengineering.
References
[1] Li, X. (2022). Efficacy of Different Repair Materials in Cranioplasty (Master’s thesis, Southwest Medical University). Link to Thesis
[2] Xu, X., Wang, J., Yu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2021). Application of Computer-Aided Design 3D Printing Polyether Ether Ketone Materials in Repairing Pediatric Cranial Bone Defects. China Digital Medicine, 1, 74-77+82.
[3] Yu, Q., Chen, L., Qiu, Z., Cui, F. (2017). Skull Repair Materials Applied in Cranioplasty: History and Progress. Brain Science Advances, 1. doi:10.18679/CN11-6030_R.2017.007.
[4] Nature Communications. (2022). An Instantly Fixable and Self-Adaptive Scaffold for Skull Regeneration by Autologous Dean&Francis Stem Cell Recruitment and Angiogenesis. Link to Article
[5] Shapiro, F. (2008). Bone Development and Its Relation to Fracture Repair. The Role of Mesenchymal Osteoblasts and Surface Osteoblasts. European Cell Materials, 15(1), 53–76.
[6] Daculsi, G., Fellah, B. H., Miramond, T., et al. (2013). Osteoconduction, Osteogenicity, Osteoinduction: What Are the Fundamental Properties for a Smart Bone Substitute. IRBM, 34(4-5), 346–348.
[7] Wu, T., Yu, S., Chen, D., et al. (2017). Bionic Design, Materials, and Performance of Bone Tissue Scaffolds. Materials, 10(10), 1187.
[8] Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015). Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Biomaterials. Journal of Biological Engineering, 9, 4.
[9] de Azevedo Gonçalves Mota, Couto, R., Da Silva, et al. (2016). 3D Printed Scaffolds as a New Perspective for Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Literature Review. Materials Science & Applications, 7(8), 430–452.
[10] Mehta, G., Mehta, K., Sud, D., et al. (2007). Quantitative Measurement and Control of Oxygen Levels in Microfluidic Poly (Dimethylsiloxane) Bioreactors during Cell Culture. Biomedical Microdevices, 9(2), 123–134.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
