Synthetic Materials Used for Cartilage Regeneration in Recent Decade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/eqgszg57Keywords:
Cartilage, osteoarthritis, cellular environment, biomimetic scaffold, 3D printing, hybrid/ composite scaffoldAbstract
Cartilage injury is considered the major cause of joint pain, swelling and dysfunction. Due to the cartilage tissue’s limited repair capacity, it’s very urgent and crucial to develop and investigate biomaterials to improve effective cartilage regeneration. Over the past decade, researchers focused of the design and preparation of a variety of synthetic materials. There synthetic scaffolds are expected to provide a favorable cellular microenvironment which is beneficial for cartilage regeneration. This review comprehensively reviews the major synthetic materials that have been recently applied in cartilage regeneration engineering, including a variety of polymers and a number of 3D printed materials. These materials have unique physicochemical structures and properties that can provide biocompatible three-dimensional porous structures, mimic the extracellular matrix environment in vivo, and promotes cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. These properties all guide the orderly regeneration of cartilage tissues. Especially through the composite with bioactive molecules, nanomaterials, etc., these materials can also realize the controlled release of biological signals and precisely regulate cell behavior. In addition, by compositing natural polymers with synthetic polymers gives the hybrid scaffolds good bioactivity, it will also enhance their mechanical properties as well as the scaffold elasticity. These techniques allow researchers to develop the most ideal scaffold that perfectly mimics the natural cartilage environment.
References
[1] Li M, Xiao R, Li JB, et al. Regenerative approaches for cartilage repair in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2017, 25(10): 1577–1587.
[2] Moradi M, Parvizpour F, Arabpour Z, et al. Articular Cartilage Injury; Current Status and Future Direction. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2024, 19(5): 653-661.
[3] Han F, Wang J, Ding L, et al. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Achievements, Future, and Sustainability in Asia. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8: 83.
[4] Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review. Bioactive Materials, 2019, 4: 271– 292.
[5] Onoue K, Wakimoto H, Jiang J, et al. Cardiomyocyte Proliferative Capacity Is Restricted in Mice With Lmna Mutation. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8: 639148.
[6] Klein EA, Yin L, Kothapalli D, et al. Cell-cycle control by physiological matrix elasticity and in vivo tissue stiffening. Curr Biol, 2009, 19(18): 1511-1518.
[7] Chiodoni C, Di Martino MT, Zazzeroni F, et al. Cell communication and signaling: how to turn bad language into positive one. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 38: 128.
[8] Jenkins TL, Little D. Synthetic scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering: cellular responses to fiber parameters. npj Regen Med, 2019, 4: 15.
[9] Bertsch C, Maréchal H, Gribova V, et al. Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: From Current Design Strategies to Medical Applications. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2023, 12: 2203115.
[10] Shiva S, Asuwin PRG, Gauri B, et al. A review on the recent applications of synthetic biopolymers in 3D printing for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2023, 34: 62.
[11] Jeong H, Rho J, Shin JY, et al. Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of PLA/PCL films. Biomed Eng Lett, 2018, 8(3): 267-272.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
